Sydney - Information Visualization and Distant Reading
What stuck out to me most from Chapters 6 & 7 and the distant reading articles is how much changing our scale alters how we approach literature. In standard English classes, we are taught to focus almost entirely on close reading, dissecting specific lines, tone, and individual word choices up close. Distant reading basically flips that on its head. By zooming out to look at huge chunks of text or metadata all at once, you can pick up on broad patterns that you would never spot just reading page by page. But as "Problems of Scale" points out, there is a real trade-off: when you zoom out that far, it is really easy to lose the small physical details and context that give a piece its actual meaning.
You can see this dynamic playing out in network tools like Six Degrees of Francis Bacon and sentiment maps like Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. Six Degrees maps out historical ties into visual webs of nodes and lines, which makes seeing connections between people really fast. But as the coursebook mentions, a line connecting two people only tells you that they had a connection, not what that relationship was actually like or why it mattered. The chart gives you a starting pattern, but a human still has to step in and do the historical interpreting.
This ties right back into my project on the Harvard Emily Dickinson Archive. The site really balances both distant and close reading. On one hand, its metadata and cataloging let you do distant reading, like tracking when she wrote certain poems, who she sent them to, or how editors changed them over time. But on the other hand, the platform forces you right back into close reading. Because Dickinson was basically a visual artist, writing by hand with custom dashes, deliberate page spacing, and attached objects like pressed flowers, a purely data-driven visual chart isn't enough. The archive proves that while macro-level tools are great for organizing massive collections, you still need close reading to actually understand the art.
I definitely agree that the discourse around distant reading contrasts a lot of what we learned in early education, which I was also surprised to see basically be a polar opposite of close reading.
ReplyDeleteGreat point about how distant reading directly can tie to your project, and how it contrasts what we have been taught. I think that tie can be very useful to you and your project.
ReplyDelete